Journal: Science Advances
Article Title: Hyperactive 20 S proteasome enhances proteostasis and ERAD in C. elegans via degradation of intrinsically disordered proteins
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adx3014
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Representative imaging of day 5 transgenic animals expressing ERAD substrate nhx-2p::sGFP::ATZ in intestinal epithelium. Scale bar, 500 μm. ( B ) ATZ aggregate quantification: Comparison of ATZ aggregate counts in nhx-2p::sGFP::ATZ (n = 35) and α3ΔN; nhx-2p::sGFP::ATZ ( n = 42) worms on day 5. Data represent mean values ± SEM, *** P < 0.001 by two-tailed unpaired t test. The bright pharyngeal signal, indicated with an asterisk *, is a genetic marker and should not be mistaken for ATZ aggregates. ( C ) Representative images of nhx-2p::sGFP::ATZ at day 7 after treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (100 μM). Images show increased accumulation of ATZ aggregates in both nhx-2p::sGFP::ATZ and α3ΔN; nhx-2p::sGFP::ATZ worms upon proteasome inhibition. Scale bars, 500 μm. ( D ) Quantification of ATZ aggregates from (C). Data represent mean values ± SEM ( n = ≥15 worms per group). P < 0.01 determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ( E to G ) Representative side-by-side fluorescent micrographs of nhx-2p ::sGFP::ATZ animals grown on control RNAi (vector) or RNAi against sel-11 (E), npl-4.1 + npl-4.2 (F), or cdc-48.1 + cdc-48.2 (G). Worms were maintained on RNAi plates until day 5 posthatching, then collected, and imaged for aggregate counting. Scale bars, 500 μm. ( H to J ) Quantification of sGFP::ATZ aggregates per worm in WT and α3ΔN backgrounds after RNAi of sel-11 (H; WT n ≥ 43, α3ΔN n ≥ 35), npl-4.1 + npl-4.2 (I; WT n ≥ 40, α3ΔN n ≥ 35), or cdc-48.1 + cdc-48.2 (J; n = 45 each). Data are mean ± SEM from ≥3 independent cohorts. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (*** P < 0.01).
Article Snippet: To assess protein synthesis, we used a fluorescent puromycin incorporation method, using 2 mM 6-FAM-dC-puromycin (Jena Bioscience), according to Wang et al. ( ) with some modifications for C. elegans .
Techniques: Imaging, Transgenic Assay, Expressing, Comparison, Two Tailed Test, Marker, Inhibition, Control, Plasmid Preparation